Although there is widespread concern in the United States about
the growing technological capacity of India and China, the nation
actually has little reliable information about the future
engineering workforce in these countries. U.S. political leaders
prescribe remedies such as increasing U.S. engineering graduation
rates to match the self-proclaimed rates of emerging competitors.
Many leaders attribute the increasing momentum in outsourcing by
U.S. companies to shortages of skilled workers and to weaknesses
in the nation’s education systems, without fully understanding why
companies outsource. Many people within and beyond government also
do not seem to look ahead and realize that what could be
outsourced next is research and design, and the United States
stands to lose its ability to “invent” the next big technologies.
At the Pratt School of Engineering of Duke University, we have
been studying the impact of globalization on the engineering
profession. Among our efforts, we have sought to assess the
comparative engineering education of the United States and its
major new competitors, India and China; identify the sources of
current U.S. global advantages; explore the factors driving the
U.S. trend towards outsourcing; and learn what the United States
can do to keep its economic edge. We believe that the data we have
obtained, through not exhaustive represent the best information
available and can help U.S. policymakers, business leaders, and
educators chart future actions. |